Response to 'Māori Indigeneity and Commodity Fetishism' by Steven Webster
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/sites-vol13iss2id355Keywords:
economic anthropology, fisheries, gift, commodity, Marxian analysisAbstract
The utility of the concepts of use-value and exchange-value, compared with gift and commodity are debated via a comparison of Hawaiian and Māori fisheries, in this response to Webster's article in this issue of Sites.Downloads
Published
30-11-2016
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright © in this published form is held by Sites: New Series, Association of Social Anthropologists of Aotearoa New Zealand, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Individual readers and non-profit libraries acting for them, are permitted to print or download a single copy of an article without charge for use in research or teaching. Permitted use includes providing a link to an article, or hosting a PDF article in online Learning Management Systems or E-Reserve Systems for authorised users. A single article may be used in print or online Course Packs. Interlibrary loan is permitted. New Zealand Copyright Law and Copyright Licensing New Zealand Education Licence provisions apply. This consent does not extend to other kinds of copying, such as copying for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes, for creating new collective works or for resale. For such uses, written permission is required. Write to the Editor: sites@otago.ac.nzHow to Cite
Response to ’Māori Indigeneity and Commodity Fetishism’ by Steven Webster. (2016). Sites: A Journal of Social Anthropology and Cultural Studies, 13(2), 19-24. https://doi.org/10.11157/sites-vol13iss2id355