Recovering Voices in Mental Health
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/sites-id487Keywords:
mental health, recovery, familes, whānau, deinstitutionalisationAbstract
This article builds from research conducted in Tāmaki Makaurau Auckland in 2008, when the Recovery Model was a guiding paradigm in mental health. While ostensibly focussed on individual mental health, the Recovery Model had wider social implications. It was connected to broader moral-political projects, including more integrated forms of partnership between the State and local communities, and greater accountability to obligations and agreements between the State and Māori under Te Tiriti o Waitangi. Post-deinstitutionalisation, mental healthcare developed new moral dimensions, as responsibility for individual well-being was resituated within a more holistic, collective framework implicating all sectors of society. Whānau and families held a central position of responsibility and care within that structure. Based on ethnographic explorations of carers’ relational practices, I explore how families experienced recovery through moments of exchange and encounter at various borderlands. My participants were primarily concerned with whether, and how, familial, treatment, and social exchanges were experienced as considerate, ethical, supportive, and just – more so than they were with medical pathology, symptom alleviation, or medication efficacy. Recovery work for healthcare providers involved creating contexts that were more empowering for commonly marginalised parties, including ‘service users’, family members, and Māori and other non-Pākehā communities. Families and whānau were tasked with defining and establishing personalised conditions for recovery on a day-to-day basis. Systemic recovery involved a shift from medical power and knowledge to privilege local, cultural, and familial perspectives, strengths, and needs. In this article, I look to participants’ deployment of everyday family rituals – including shared kai/food, time and space, gifting, and adornment – as modes of domestic resistance, as well as familial insistence, that can challenge confinements of institutional power.Downloads
Published
11-03-2022
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright © in this published form is held by Sites: New Series, Association of Social Anthropologists of Aotearoa New Zealand, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Individual readers and non-profit libraries acting for them, are permitted to print or download a single copy of an article without charge for use in research or teaching. Permitted use includes providing a link to an article, or hosting a PDF article in online Learning Management Systems or E-Reserve Systems for authorised users. A single article may be used in print or online Course Packs. Interlibrary loan is permitted. New Zealand Copyright Law and Copyright Licensing New Zealand Education Licence provisions apply. This consent does not extend to other kinds of copying, such as copying for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes, for creating new collective works or for resale. For such uses, written permission is required. Write to the Editor: sites@otago.ac.nzHow to Cite
Recovering Voices in Mental Health. (2022). Sites: A Journal of Social Anthropology and Cultural Studies, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.11157/sites-id487